|
"Historia de los Buscadores"
Comienza la reescritura de la Historia
Gradiva Couzin
1998: The spam days
Once upon a time, search engine marketing (SEM) was known as search engine
optimization (SEO), and was primarily achieved by formulaic algorithms and
automatic submittals. The search engines' indexing programs would look at the
text on a page and use a "secret formula" to determine page rankings. This era
could also be called the Golden Age of Spam, because it was possible get a high
rank by repeating a keyword multiple times, or through other similar techniques.
(Yahoo! is an exception - Yahoo! has always been indexed by humans who could
identify and ban spammers' websites).
Gradually, search engines started recognizing spam and penalizing accordingly.
Unscrupulous search engine optimizers were continually trying to find new and
ingenious ways to fool the indexing algorithms, and search engines were always
one step behind. Clearly, search engines needed innovations that took control
away from the spammers and auto-submitters. One early anti-spam innovation was
incorporating off-the-page information.
1999: Incorporating off-the-page information
Around mid-1999, search engines began using the intelligence of the masses to
improve the quality of search results. DirectHit (since acquired by Ask Jeeves)
introduced a technology that watches which sites are chosen by searchers. In
this system, a website that is regularly chosen for a given keyword will rise in
ranking for that keyword. More clicks = higher rank! Higher rank = more clicks!
This system gives big, popular sites an advantage over smaller competitors.
Another way to utilize the intelligence of the masses is to rank pages based on
how many other pages are linked to it. This is called "link popularity" and
remains a very important factor in ranking. Again, the advantage goes to the
large, popular site.
Both of the above parameters are known as "off-the-page" factors because they
are factors that are not directly based on the content on your web page. The
appeal of "off-the-page" factors is that spam efforts do not influence them.
Google, for example, has made excellent use of the link popularity factor in its
well-known PageRank algorithm.
1999: Community-edited directories
Human-edited directories provide quality results and are not susceptible to spam,
but often lack quantity because of the limited number of editors. For example,
Yahoo!, being primarily a human-edited directory, is limited by the size of its
editorial staff, and has difficulty keeping up with the huge number of sites
that deserve indexing.
A solution to this problem is the "community-edited" directory. The community-edited
paradigm allows for thousands of editors, organized in a system of self-governance,
to constantly improve and add to a directory. The Netscape Open Directory
Project was the first of these, and the (now defunct) Go.com directory was
another early leader. Zeal.com, which feeds results into Looksmart.com and MSN
search, is a newer addition to this category.
The Netscape Open Directory had the additional bright idea of being open source.
This means that the content in their directory is available for free display on
any website. The result is that in the year 2000, listings from Open Directory
started showing up on almost every major search engine, along with many other
portals and miscellaneous sites on the web.
The marriage of size and quality has made community-edited directories an
important element in the search world.
2000: Paid listings
In 1999, AltaVista tried to introduce paid listings, was universally denounced,
and dropped the idea almost immediately. In contrast, by the end of 2000 all
major search engines offered some kind of paid listing option. Overture (previously
Goto) began this trend and is still a major player, offering ranking for
keywords based on an auction system: the higher the bid, the higher your rank.
The bid amount is charged every time a user clicks on your site listing, a
payment model known as pay-per-click (PPC), also known as "Pay-for-performance."
Overture was later joined by Google AdWords, and these are now the two major
players in the PPC market.
Additionally, in 2001 most directories and search engines introduced various
payment models for listing submittals: submittal fees for major human-edited
directories, indexing fees for the major spiders, and several different types of
ad placement opportunities. Yahoo! introduced a "Business Express" submittal fee
for commercial content, which was later changed to a yearly fee. Looksmart
switched from a one-time submittal fee to a PPC model. Major spiders Inktomi,
AltaVista, and FAST Search introduced paid inclusion models - a yearly fee that
ensures a site will be listed and regularly re-spidered.
As of 2001, a typical search engine marketing campaign involved at least some
form of expenditure, either yearly or on a per-click basis.
2001: Google's rise to prominence
The years 2000 - 2001 heralded the rise of Google to prominence among search
engines. While other search engines were focusing on becoming "portals," Google
kept an extremely simple and quick interface that focused solely on search
results. Google also developed advanced features such as PDF search and Flash
search. Additionally, Google's use of "off-the-page" factors such as link
popularity made it quite spam-resistant. Google's dominance was cinched when
Yahoo! switched its secondary search result partnership from Inktomi to Google
in July of 2000 (Yahoo! later began using Google for its primary search
results). Many additional partnerships, including AOL and Ask Jeeves, followed.
With Google's success, several other search engines are attempting to follow its
lead: Wisenut, Teoma, and FAST search are competitors that present simple, quick
search results. Other threats to Google include the Inktomi spider, now owned by
Yahoo!. It remains to be seen whether any of these will succeed in chipping away
at Google's monopoly.
Brief History of Search Engine Marketing on the Web - Part II
Its past and its future by Gradiva Couzin
Sep 29, 2003
Editor's note: Click here to read Part I of this article.
2002 – 2003: Hybridization and partnerships
Hybridization of search results means that search engines can combine the best
of all worlds: high quality listings from editorially-reviewed directories, a
large quantity of pages indexed by the large spiders (Inktomi, Google, and
others), and income from PPC listings. By 2001, all major search engines
provided search results using a hybrid of the various systems mentioned above.
For example, Yahoo! search results mixed Yahoo!-directory results, Overture
(PPC) results, and Google results. MSN provided results from Overture (PPC),
Looksmart, and Inktomi.
2002 marked several major purchases among search engines: Yahoo! purchased
Inktomi, Overture purchased FAST, and there were also many shifts in search
engine partnership contracts. The 2003 purchase of Overture by Yahoo! was
another step in what appears to be an industry consolidation.
Consolidation certainly simplifies the job of the search engine marketer: no
longer do you need to worry about submittals and optimization for five or more
major search engines. And for the novice searcher, consolidation may actually be
an improvement. A novice searcher who doesn't have the savvy to try multiple
sources may have better luck with one large, hybrid search engine. However, it
represents a loss to the searching public overall. Fewer independent editorial
staffs and index databases mean fewer options for a searcher when he or she has
special searching needs. For example, currently I often use Yahoo! directory
when searching for an official company site, Froogle for shopping search, Google
for most other searches, and AltaVista or FAST if I don't find what I'm looking
for at Google. Search engine consolidation would take away much of this choice
and control.
2003: Little guys get in on PPC with contextual advertising
"Contextual advertising" is a general term for sponsored links that are run on
content sites around the web, rather than just on search engines. This term was
originally used to describe systems (such as eZula and Gator) that created
hyperlinks within the HTML of content pages. For example, if your webpage
utilized the word "car," these systems would change the way your page looked to
users, and make each instance of the word "car" into a link to their search
results. Before 2003, these systems did not get the content provider's
permission, did not label the links as ads, did not provide revenue to the
content provider, and required a browser plug-in that was often installed
without the users knowledge or consent. Because of these flaws, it is a system
that was never embraced by the SEM community.
In 2003, the "little guy" got a chance to jump on the PPC bandwagon in a
legitimate way with the launch of Google AdSense. AdSense allows almost any
content-provider on the web to list Google AdWords (PPC links) on his or her
site and receive part of the PPC revenue. The advertisements are clearly labeled
and separated from content, similar to a banner ad. Overture is expected to
launch a similar service in the near future. The success of this service will
depend on good editorial review (or excellent algorithms) to ensure that ads are
served on well-matched pages. My hope is that the system will evolve into one
that allows content providers to choose which ads will run on their pages. This
would provide a natural, built-in editorial review to ensure appropriate, well-matched
advertising and maximized clickthrough rates.
2004 and onward: The future of search engine marketing
Search engines have evolved into sophisticated systems, and will continue to
enhance their technical side, with improved capabilities to index "deep" pages
and pages that are dynamically generated, indexing of non-HTML content such as
PDFs, Macromedia Flash, and graphics, improved ability to rapidly integrate new
content such as news using XML feeds or other technology, organization of search
results into logical categories, artificial intelligence, personalized search,
and other advanced features. (For insights into the future of search, visit
Google Labs and Overture research.) These advances will improve the quality of
the search experience for everyone. Search results will be more accurate, and
spam techniques will be a thing of the past. The site optimization techniques of
1998-1999 will be only a very small portion of search engine marketing.
At the same time, corporate mergers, consolidation, and the old-fashioned "highest-bidder"
approach are making search engines feel more and more like a traditional
advertising venue. Search engine marketing firms will need to provide services
similar to an advertising firm: understanding client business goals and messages,
choosing advertising channels, and designing campaigns that will capture user
interest and attention.
Lastly, the search engine marketer will need to provide a holistic approach to
the user experience of searching for, finding, and utilizing a business website.
This could include usability studies, conversion tracking, and research related
to the user experience on a website. When all is said and done, the success of a
business website depends on much more than its rank on a search engine.
Each of the above components, site optimization, advertising management, and
holistic online marketing analysis, will be key components of online marketing
in the future. The question arises whether these services will be provided by
stand-alone SEM firms, or if they will be absorbed into advertising firms and
marketing departments. My belief is that the SEM specialty firm will survive for
at least the next several years. After that, some SEM firms may be bought up by
advertising firms, some of the work will be absorbed into corporate marketing
departments, and some will be provided by the PPC engine's sales agents. My hope
is that my favorite part of SEM - consulting with companies about their business
goals and then developing a customized online marketing strategy, including
usability, writing, and design - will survive to become a successful, vital
industry in its own right.
Gracias.
I THINK
GOOGLE.COM
|